- Hollywood Tech Nerds
- Posts
- Blender in the Backrooms
Blender in the Backrooms
PLUS: The Times on Tilly
Hello Hollywood tech nerds!
In this week’s post:
Subscribe to get Hollywood Tech Nerds magically delivered to your inbox every Tuesday!
Blender in the Backrooms

A24’s Backrooms had a huge opening weekend, prompting some of the most hilarious commentary imaginable:
That a movie born from an internet meme opened bigger than the latest Pixar movie and sequels to The Devil Wears Prada and Scream is melting brains in the offices of studio executives who have long trusted that established brands and franchises were the most reliable way to get butts in seats. That formula is being turned on its head this spring.
Sorry, this is just comically stupid! The idea of the Backrooms isn’t just an “internet meme,” it is itself an “established brand and franchise,” one that the film’s director has spent years exploring in his webseries, along with other online creators. The difference is that it’s not 20, 30 or 50-year old IP targeted at the aging Gen X and millennial moviegoing audience around which Hollywood has rotated since the 2000s. It’s also not a franchise owned and controlled by a multibillion dollar corporation. Uh-oh!
The brains of studio execs should not be “melting” upon learning that young audiences will turn out for a movie that is relevant and exciting to them. If it is, you should probably seek work elsewhere!
I saw Backrooms over the weekend, and was really impressed at how difficult it was to discern what in the movie was computer-generated, and what were physical sets. Phantasmag has an interview with VFX supervisor Edward J. Douglas on how they achieved this, largely using Blender.
One of the early things that we did was to make sure we could perfectly replicate Backrooms environments in CG and VFX. We took the original 4chan Backrooms image, reverse engineered it, match moved it, and figured out what lens it was on. Then we built a one-to-one match and showed Kane and asked, ‘Can you tell which is ours and which is the original?’ In that first version, there was one tiny, tiny giveaway, and it was the shape of a glow around a fluorescent light. The glow was a little bit wider than the real one would've been, but it was so, so, close. Once we hit that, we knew we were in a pretty good place. So everything in Blender came out of that, all those tests.
We were able to test out both the original Backrooms look as well as match the on-set carpets and wallpaper, which were a little different. The original Backrooms image looks yellow, but that was colour-balanced. The walls were more of a white, a beige originally. But of course, in the Kane Parsons lore, it is more yellow. It is a certain colour of carpet. So Danny Vermette, the production designer, and Kane tested so many different types of wallpaper so that they had that yellow feeling and the right carpets, but the actors looked great, and the skin tones looked great in that world.
The Times on Tilly

I was having a nice, relaxing Sunday. I sipped my coffee on the porch, once again tried to befriend the neighborhood murder of crows, and opened The New York Times Magazine, which immediately filled me with murderous rage upon reading its major story: “I Profile Celebrities for a Living. Nothing Prepared Me for Tilly Norwood.”
That’s right! After months of relative quiet, my bête noire resurfaced beyond the dumb-dumb industry trades and is now being “interviewed” by the storied Times.
It was harder than you think to remember that Tilly is just a computer because millions of years of evolution have made it so that when I stare at something that looks and acts like a human, my brain keeps rounding up, making her human. The tripwires of my uncanny valley are highly refined, but because either a world of slop has bulldozed right through those tripwires or Tilly is so good, I also don’t feel grossed out or upset by the sight of her. (Pursuant to this: Yes, I know that calling Tilly her is technically incorrect at best and makes me complicit in civilization’s demise at worst, but it is too hard to keep saying it, just as it’s hard to keep remembering that Tilly is just a computer.)
Time for the Shrek Rule! “It was harder than you think to remember that Shrek is just a CGI character because millions of years of evolution have made it so that when I stare at something that looks and acts like an ogre, my brain keeps rounding up, making him ogre. The tripwires of my uncanny valley are highly refined, but because either a world of slop has bulldozed right through those tripwires or Shrek is so good, I also feel grossed out and upset by the sight of him (because he is an ugly, smelly ogre). (Pursuant to this: Yes, I know that calling Shrek him is technically incorrect at best and makes me complicit in civilization’s demise at worst, but it is too hard to keep saying it, just as it’s hard to keep remembering that Shrek is just a CGI character.)”
I am being somewhat unfair to the Times and the profile, which I do encourage you to read in full, because its larger point is that it is humanity and human-ness that is interesting, and Tilly/Shrek is not:
But Tilly? I don’t think I’ll ever think of her again after this story is published. Even as I write this, just days after my time with her, I can’t picture her. Seriously. I’m closing my eyes right now, and I can’t see her face. But what did you want? Tilly is just a computer. Oh, my god. Why am I interviewing a computer? What has happened to the world that I am interviewing a computer?
Couldn’t have said it better myself! Maybe the solution is to just stop giving them any attention at all? Because you once again allowed Tilly’s creator Eline van der Velden another platform to spout her dubious claims about the industry’s interest in Tilly, which just continues to prolong this ridiculous grift.
Kernels (3 links worth making popcorn for)

Here’s a round-up of cool and interesting links about Hollywood and technology:
Amazon’s AI “Good Advice Cupcake” show horrifies its original creator. (link)
The secret to Roku’s success: not being cool. (link)
The film noir cinematography of Spider-Noir. (link)